The Lidar/dGPS Washington Top 100 List

The Lidar/dGPS Washington Top 100 List

Surveying East Fury, number 100 on the list (photo by Ross Wallette)

Eric Gilbertson, Kyle Bretherton

Aug 2017 – Oct 2024

Summary

All peaks and contender peaks in WA for the Top 100 list have now been surveyed by either Lidar, dGPS, or both. It is now known exactly which 100 peaks are on the list. All double summit disputes have been resolved with theodolite, sight level, Lidar, dGPS, or a combination of these.

Significant changes from the Quad-based WA Top 100 list to the Lidar/dGPS WA Top 100 list:

-East Fury, Solitude, Chalangin, Blac

kcap added
-Sherman removed since prominence less than 400ft
-Luna, Switchback, St Helens removed
-Order changed based on updated elevations
-Rainier summit has changed location (lilkely around 2014, from Columbia Crest to SW Rim, since Columbia Crest melted down 21.8ft)
-Eldorado summit changed location from icecap to rock (likely around 2020, since icecap has melted down 20ft)
-East Fury summit changed location from icecap to rock (likely in early 2000s or 1990s, since icecap melted down 30ft)
-Liberty Cap icecap melted down 26.3 ft. Summit location unchanged, but elevation/prominence have changed.
-Cardinal true summit is actually 5th class spire south of traditional summit, measured taller with theodolite survey
-St Helens has been losing elevation from erosion at a rate 4in/year since 1989 and left the T100 list around 2021
-Double summit cases have been resolved for Cardinal, Katsuk, Sherpa, Enchantment, Greenwood, Buckner, Buck, Copper, Big Craggy

Link to Lidar/dGPS WA Top 100 List: https://tinyurl.com/ysdvvrbm

Locations of ground surveys

Introduction

Climbing the hundred highest peaks in Washington is a popular peakbagging objective, involving glacier travel, rock climbing, bushwhacking, and general adventure. The list of the hundred highest peaks was first compiled by a group of climbers calling themselves the Bulgers in 1976 after the final of the 1:24,000 quads became available. Quadrangles (called quads for short) are topographic maps put out by the US Geological Survey (USGS). By 1976 all peaks were covered by the quads, with accuracy defined by 40ft contours.

The Bulgers generally chose the hundred highest list to include the hundred highest peaks with at least 400ft of prominence as determined by the quads. Prominence is a measure of how high a mountain rises above a saddle connecting it to a higher peak. Defining a prominence cutoff ensures minor bumps along a ridge don’t count as separate peaks. A peak must stick out enough on its own to be considered. According to John Lixvar, the 400ft prominence rule was chosen because “The distinction looks right in the field and can be clearly determined from maps with 40, 80 and 100 foot contour intervals.” (see http://www.rhinoclimbs.com/bulgers.html)

Surveying Buckner with the theodolite to resolve the double summit (photo by Steven Song)

There were a few exceptions to the 400ft rule, though. Seven named summits with less than 400ft of prominence based on the quads were included (Seven Fingered Jack, Sahale, Dark, Rahm, Horseshoe, Little Annapurna, and Blackcap). Volcanic subpeaks were required to have 800ft of prominence to be included. According to John Lixvar, the 800ft prominence rule was expressly formulated to not treat Liberty Cap (quad-based prominence 472ft) and Columbia Crest (the historic summit of Rainier) as separate mountains, but to still include Little Tahoma (quad-based prominence 818ft).

This had the unintended consequence of eliminating Lincoln, Colfax, and Sherman peaks from the Bulgers list, despite each having at least 400ft of prominence based on the quads.

Surveying Cardinal with the theodolite to resolve the double summit (photo by Nick)

The 800ft threshold was chosen because it is the only number greater than 472 (Liberty Cap quad-based prominence) and less than 818 (the quad-based prominence of Little Tahoma) that has 100, 40, and 80 as common denominators. The numbers 40 and 80 need to be common denominators so prominence can be accurately determined from 7.5 minute and 15 minute series quads without interpolation. 100 must be included so prominence can be determined from maps with 100 ft contours.

This list of peaks is generally referred to as the Bulgers or the Bulgers list or the Bulgers Top 100 list and is the most common list peakbaggers use to work on the Washington hundred highest peaks. But a second way to climb the Washington hundred highest peaks is to use a more rigorous definition including only the top 100 peaks with at least 400ft of prominence. This is referred to as the Washington Top 100 list. This list is not as popular because it includes Lincoln Peak, generally considered one of the most difficult peaks in Washington. But both lists are recognized by the Bulgers committee, and completers of either list are recognized at the annual Bulgers party.

Surveying East Fury with the theodolite (photo by Nick)

The Washington Top 100 list was first compiled by John Roper and Jeff Howbert betwee 1987-2001 based on the USGS quads. (see http://www.rhinoclimbs.com/Top100xP400.htm).

As of 2024 there have been 102 climbers to complete the Bulgers List and 21 climbers to complete the traditional quad-based Washington Top 100 list.

The Bulgers List stays constant and unchanged for historical reasons. However, the Washington Top 100 list should be updated if more accurate surveys are conducted. This is how it will maintain its status as the accurate list of the 100 highest peaks in Washington with at least 400ft of prominence.

Sherpa peak survey with Abney level

In 2018 I finished climbing the Bulger List of peaks (completer number 70), and in 2019 I finished the quad-based Washington Top 100 list (completer number 17), finishing on Lincoln Peak. I then moved on to other peakbagging objectives. But in the fall of 2022 I started looking into one of the Bulger peaks with some controversy surrounding it. Buckner Mountain has two summits, an easier SW summit that is third class and a harder 4th class NE summit. They are very similar in height, so close that it’s not really possible to tell by eye which is taller.

Most climbers stop at the SW summit since it’s the first one reached on the normal ascent route. John Roper was convinced it hadn’t been surveyed accurately enough to know for sure which was the true highpoint. I brought a little handheld 5x 10 arcminute Abney level up and determined it was too close to call based on that device’s accuracy. I really wanted to settle the controversy, so I bought a 20-arcsecond 30x mechanical theodolite and taught myself how to use it.

Big Kangaroo theodolite survey

In October 2022 I brought the theodolite and a tripod up and did a careful survey to determine that the SW summit is 1.6ft taller than the NE summit.

This got me thinking that there might be other controversial peaks on the Washington Top 100 list. The quad only has 40ft contour intervals, which is not accurate enough to capture a difference of 1.6ft between two contender summits of the same peak. Also, not every peak was directly surveyed on the quad. If the peak has an elevation written on the quad, then it was surveyed directly by a surveyor pointing a theodolite at it. But peaks without the elevation written only have approximate elevations above the nearest 40ft contour line. If they were close to having enough height or prominence for list inclusion but had just never been surveyed, then perhaps they were actually Washington Top 100 peaks but nobody knew it.

Lidar coverage as of spring 2024 (this was updated later in 2024)

I now had the equipment to survey just like the original USGS surveyors, so I could theoretically figure out if the existing Washington Top 100 list was accurate. If it wasn’t, I could update it to be as accurate as possible. I also had access to equipment more accurate than used in the original USGS surveys. Lidar measurements from planes were slowly being published for Washington and ready for analysis, and I was also able to use differential GPS units from Seattle University and Trimble that could give absolute elevations to the nearest inch.

My goal was to thoroughly and accurately determine the true hundred highest peaks in Washington with at least 400ft of prominence: the Washington Top 100 list. I would consider the project complete when I knew for certain exactly which 100 peaks were on the list, and exactly where the summit of each of the 100 peaks was (meaning all double summit cases would be resolved).

Solitude dGPS survey

In the fall of 2023 I posted an updated WA Top 100 list, based on over a dozen theodolite and abney level surveys relative to quad-surveyed points, analysis of all existing Lidar data, and many dGPS ground surveys. That update can be found here: https://www.countryhighpoints.com/washington-top-100-peaks-updated-list/

I still had unfinished business though, at the end of the 2023 surveying season. Several dozen peaks had still not been measured by Lidar or dGPS. A few double summits remained unresolved, and there was uncertainty exactly which 100 peaks were on the list.

Rainier dGPS survey (photo by Ross Wallette)

Over the summer and fall 2024 I completed the remaining dGPS surveys. Lidar measurements were published for the remaining peaks on the list and contender peaks, and Kyle and I analyzed the data.

Methodology

During summer and fall 2024 Kyle and I focused on analyzing Lidar data for the remaining peaks. Then I took dGPS ground surveys to measure peaks where Lidar data was not accurate enough. These fell into three main categories: peaks whose elevation changes over time due to erosion or icecap melting, peaks tied for elevation based on Lidar, and peaks with double summits within the error bounds of Lidar.

Liberty Cap dGPS survey (photo by Ross Wallette)

Lidar Analysis

I downloaded Lidar data from two sources, the Washington Lidar Portal (https://lidarportal.dnr.wa.gov/ ) and the USGS TNM database (https://apps.nationalmap.gov/downloader/). Lidar data was spread across both databases, so both were needed.

I analyzed the raw point cloud laz files using QGIS (qgis.org), a free software package.

Peaks with Changing Summit Elevations

Six peaks and contender peaks have summits that change elevation from year to year. St Helens has a summit composed of loose volcanic sediment that erodes every year. I’d previously discovered it loses on average 4 inches per year, and I took a dGPS measurement in 2023 consistent with this conclusion. I returned to remeasure it again in 2024.

Colfax Peak dGPS survey (photo by Ross Wallette)

Five peaks have or used to have icecap summits. This means the summit remains ice throughout the summer. These peaks are Rainier, Liberty Cap, Colfax, Eldorado, and East Fury. I took dGPS measurements on each of these peaks. For Rainier I collaborated with professional surveyors from the Land Surveyors Association of Washington to plan measurements and peer-review results. I took multiple measurements in August and September and measured four USGS monuments on the mountain to corroborate results.

For the other icecap peaks I mounted the dGPS on the highest point. If the icecap had melted enough that a rock summit was the new highpoint, I measured the elevation between the rock and icecap summits using an abney level.

Peaks tied for elevation based on Lidar

St Helens dGPS survey Sept 2024

After analyzing the Lidar data, we discovered there was a three-way tie for number 100 on the list. The tie was between St Helens, East Fury, and Switchback. These peaks were the same elevation within the error bounds of Lidar.

In general Lidar measurements are accurate to within +/-0.3ft in flat open terrain (see https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-lidar-data-and-where-can-i-download-it ). But measurements are only taken approximately every 3-6ft horizontal spacing. So sharp summits can be missed. This means Lidar can generally just be trusted to the nearest foot or so on mountain summits. Each of these three peaks were the same elevation to the nearest foot based on Lidar. I took dGPS measurements for each of these summits. (Note: Lidar can also over -read by a few feet in snow, and can misclassify dense brush as ground, leading to over-measurements by a few feet. Brush is not a problem for any Top 100 peak summits, but snow is).

Big Craggy double summit survey Oct 2024

Double Summits

One double summit remained unresolved – Big Craggy. It had two possible summit locations separated by 420ft horizontal and within 0.2ft elevation difference based on Lidar. This was well-within the error bounds of Lidar, so I surveyed these with dGPS.

Measurements

All Lidar data was published in NAVD88 vertical datum. To be consistent with the historical quad-based WA Top 100 list, we converted all elevations to NGVD29 datum using NCAT (https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/NCAT/), a tool provided by NOAA.

For dGPS surveys I processed data with OPUS (https://geodesy.noaa.gov/OPUS/)and CSRS-PPP. These are free publically-available software tools for surveyors provided by the US government and Canadian government.

Eldorado Peak survey Sept 2024 (photo by Ross Wallette)

For the Rainier measurements, professional surveyors additionally procesed the data using WSRN, the Washington State Reference Network.

Results

All peaks and contender peaks have now been measured by Lidar, dGPS, or both. It is now known exactly which 100 peaks are on the list. All double summit cases have been resolved.

The historical icecap summit of Mount Rainier, Columbia Crest, used to be 14,410ft as measured in 1956, and 14,411ft as measured in 1988 and 1998. Columbia Crest is now 14,389.2ft +/-0.1ft. This means Columbia Crest has melted down 21.8ft since the last ground survey in 1998 and is no longer the highest point on Mt Rainier. The new summit location of Mt Rainier is now rock on the southwest rim, a distance of roughly 500ft away horizontal. The highest rock is 14,399.6ft +/-0.1ft and this is the new elevation of Mt Rainier.

Rainier elevation vs time for Columbia Crest and SW Rim

Liberty cap used to be 14,117ft based on the most recent Lidar measurements from 2007. It is now 14,090.7ft +/-0.1ft. This means the summit has melted down 26.3ft since 2007. The summit is still ice, though, so has not changed location.

Colfax peak is now 9,439.9ft +/-0.1ft and is maintaining elevation within +/-2ft of the most recent Lidar surveys of 2022 and 2015. The summit is still ice and has not changed location. However, the key col for Colfax, the Colfax – Baker col, has melted down 16ft since 2022.

The historical icecap summit of Eldorado Peak used to be 8,885ft in 1950. The icecap summit is now 8,865ft. This means the icecap summit has melted down 20ft since 1950 and is no longer the highest point on the mountain. The new highpoint location is a rocky outcrop 100ft away horizontal from the icecap, at an elevation 8,873.3 ft +/-0.1ft.

St Helens elevation over time

The historical icecap summit of East Fury used to be 8,333ft in 1980. The icecap summit is now 8,303ft, meaning it has melted 30ft since 1980 and is no longer the highest point on the mountain. The new summit is a rock outcrop to the west 100ft away horizontal with an elevation of  8321.5ft +/-0.1ft.

Mt St Helens was measured to have the same elevation in 2024 as 2023 at 8321.1ft.

The three-way tie for number 100 was broken, with East Fury number 100 (8321.5ft), and Switchback and St Helens tied for number 101 (both at 8321.1ft).

The double summit of Big Craggy was resolved with the western summit 0.2ft taller than the eastern summit. The western summit is 8473.3ft.

Significant changes from the Quad-based WA Top 100 list to the Lidar/dGPS-based WA Top 100 list:

-East Fury, Solitude, Chalangin, Blackcap added
-Sherman removed since prominence less than 400ft
-Luna, Switchback, St Helens removed
-Order changed based on updated elevations
-Rainier summit has changed location (lilkely around 2014, from Columbia Crest to SW Rim, since Columbia Crest melted down 21.8ft)
-Eldorado summit changed location from icecap to rock (likely around 2020, since icecap has melted down 20ft)
-East Fury summit changed location from icecap to rock (likely in early 2000s, since icecap melted down 30ft)
-Liberty Cap icecap melted down 26.3 ft. Summit location unchanged, but elevation/prominence have changed.
-Cardinal true summit is actually 5th class spire south of traditional summit, measured taller with theodolite survey
-St Helens has been losing elevation from erosion at a rate 4in/year since 1989 and left the T100 list around 2021
-Double summit cases have been resolved for Cardinal, Katsuk, Sherpa, Enchantment, Greenwood, Buckner, Buck, Copper, Big Craggy

Link to Lidar/dGPS WA Top 100 List: https://tinyurl.com/ysdvvrbm

The Lidar/dGPS WA Top 100 List, with link to survey report if applicable (Lidar elevations rounded to nearest foot, dGPS elevations to the nearest 0.1ft):

Rank Peak Elevation NGVD29 Prominence Method
1 Mount Rainier 14,399.6 13,209.6 Differential GPS
2 Liberty Cap 14,090.7 480.7 Differential GPS
3 Mount Adams 12,273 8,132 Lidar
4 Little Tahoma 11,136 850 Lidar
5 Mount Baker 10,773 8,837 Lidar
6 Glacier Peak 10,544 7,537 Lidar
7 Bonanza Peak 9,503 3,726 Lidar
8 Colfax Peak 9,439.9 472.9 Differential GPS
9 Mount Stuart 9,414 5,341 Lidar
10 Mount Fernow 9,241 2,808 Lidar
11 Goode Mountain 9,223 3,834 Lidar
12 Mount Shuksan 9,125 4,404 Lidar
13 Mount Buckner 9,111 3,064 Lidar
14 Mount Logan 9,097 1,518 Lidar
15 Lincoln Peak 9,096 744 Lidar
16 Mount Maude 9,077 938 Lidar
17 Jack Mountain 9,065 4,214 Lidar
18 Black Peak 8,986 3,497 Lidar
19 Mount Spickard 8,978 4,820 Lidar
20 Copper Peak 8,960 502 Lidar
21 Mount Redoubt 8,958 1,843 Lidar
22 North Gardner Mountain 8,958 4,019 Lidar
23 Dome Peak 8,921 3,079 Lidar
24 Gardner Mountain 8,897 716 Lidar
25 Silver Star Mountain 8892 2473 Lidar
26 Boston Peak 8,883 930 Lidar
27 Eldorado Peak 8873.3 2208.3 Differential GPS
28 Forbidden Peak 8839 1073 Lidar
29 Dragontail Peak 8836 1782 Lidar
30 Mesahchie Peak 8805 2299 Lidar
31 Oval Peak 8795 2730 Lidar
32 Mount Lago 8743 3280 Lidar
33 Robinson Mountain 8724 1700 Lidar
34 Colchuck Peak 8706 684 Lidar
35 Star Peak 8688 1198 Lidar
36 Remmel Mountain 8683 4327 Lidar
37 Fortress Mountain 8679 1654 Lidar
38 Katsuk Peak 8678.5 435.5 Differential GPS
39 Cannon Mountain 8652 922 Lidar
40 Kimtah Peak 8644 1119 Lidar
41 Mount Custer 8648 1314 Lidar
42 Sherpa Peak 8630 431 Lidar
43 Ptarmigan Peak 8614 904 Lidar
44 Monument Peak 8610 1106 Lidar
45 Mount Carru 8604 997 Lidar
46 Cathedral Peak 8599 1021 Lidar
47 Raven Ridge 8592 1180 Lidar
48 Cardinal Peak 8591 2094 Lidar.
49 Clark Mountain 8582 1540 Lidar
50 Osceola Peak 8579 1152 Lidar
51 Storm King 8560 659 Lidar
52 Enchantment Peak 8538 517 Lidar.
53 Buck Mountain 8534 1923 Lidar
54 Cashmere Mountain 8514 1655 Lidar
55 Reynolds Peak 8512 2043 Lidar
56 Martin Peak Holden 8504 2152 Lidar
57 Hard Mox 8501 964 Lidar
58 Klawatti Peak 8500 718 Lidar
59 Primus Peak 8497 843 Lidar
60 Big Craggy Peak 8473.3 3133.3 Differential GPS
61 Hoodoo Peak 8470 472 Lidar
62 Mount Bigelow 8468 812 Lidar
63 Dorado Needle 8466 841 Lidar
64 Lost Peak 8466 1621 Lidar
65 Argonaut Peak 8455 726 Lidar
66 Chiwawa Mountain 8453 1276 Lidar
67 Luahna Peak 8445 810 Lidar
68 Tower Mountain 8440 2904 Lidar
69 Azurite Peak 8440 1943 Lidar
70 Sinister Peak 8439 853 Lidar
71 Golden Horn 8418 1216 Lidar
72 Emerald Peak 8414 753 Lidar
73 Dumbell Mountain 8411 1316 Lidar
74 Greenwood Mountain 8408 658 Lidar
75 Solitude Peak 8402.8 414.1 Differential GPS
76 Blackcap 8402.4 406.2 Differential GPS
77 Saska Peak 8399 670 Lidar
78 Spectacle Buttes 8395 1105 Lidar
79 Pinnacle Mountain 8395 1739 Lidar
80 Easy Mox 8392 586 Lidar
81 Courtney Peak 8389 800 Lidar
82 Devore Peak 8378 1763 Lidar
83 Big Snagtooth 8374.3 622.3 Differential GPS
84 Lake Mountain 8372 834 Lidar
85 Martin Peak (Sawtooths) 8372 906 Lidar
86 Mount Ballard 8371.0 867.0 Differential GPS
87 Amphitheater Mountain 8369 807 Lidar
88 West Craggy 8367 728 Lidar
89 Austera Peak 8366 485 Lidar
90 Chalangin 8366 410 Lidar
91 McClellan Peak 8363 1247 Lidar
92 Mount Formidable 8352.9 1941.9 Differential GPS
93 Snowfield Peak 8346 2916 Lidar
94 Castle 8343.3 3263.3 Differential GPS
95 Tupshin Peak 8343 1144 Lidar
96 Windy Peak 8335.1 1807.1 Differential GPS
97 Cosho Peak 8333 517 Lidar
98 Abernathy Peak 8327 824 Lidar
99 Flora Mountain 8323 1805 Lidar
100 Mount Fury East Peak 8321.5 3113.5 Differential GPS
101 Mount Saint Helens 8321.1 4590.1 Differential GPS
101 Switchback Mountain 8321.1 471.1 Differential GPS
Big Kangaroo 8318 1051 Lidar
Spider Mountain 8312 970 Lidar
Apex 8302.0 1013.0 Differential GPS
West Fury 8298 358 Lidar
Andrew 8293.5 1625.5 Differential GPS
The Temple 8290 837 Lidar
Luna 8286 1348 Lidar
Sherman Peak 10133.0 395.0 Differential GPS

Discussion

The Lidar/dGPS WA Top 100 list is now complete, meaning it is known exactly which 100 peaks are on the list and all double summit disputes have been resolved. Thirteen peaks on the list have summit elevations measured by dGPS, and the remaining 87 peaks have summits measured by Lidar. All key cols in the US have also been measured by Lidar, dGPS, or both. (The key cols for Rainier and Baker are in British Columbia, which is not covered by Lidar, so digital elevation models are used for these cols). Peaks with elevations that change over time have had summit measurements in 2024, so are as up to date as possible.

Klawatti key col survey

It is possible the order of a few peaks on the list could be switched if they have not yet been measured by dGPS, only by Lidar. Any peaks within a few feet of elevation based on Lidar might switch order if surveyed by dGPS. For instance, the pairs Redoubt and North Gardner, Dorado Needle and Lost, Tower and Azurite, South Spectacle Butte and Pinnacle, Lake and Martin (Sawtooths), and Austera and Chalangin are each tied to the nearest foot based on Lidar. Currently for these tied peaks the peak with the highest Lidar-based elevation is listed higher, but this could change with a dGPS survey. None of these are close enough to the bottom of the list to affect which peaks are on the list, though. A future project could be to measure each of the remaining 87 peaks with dGPS for a dGPS WA Top 100 list.

It is likely that in future years St Helens will continue to erode. However, because it is already at number 101, its erosion will not affect the fact that it is not on the top 100 list. I would like to re-measure St Helens every year to track this erosion.

Rainier, Eldorado, and East Fury are all now rock summits, so while the icecaps near the summits will likely continue to melt, this will not affect the summit elevation of the peaks.

Rainier dGPS survey Aug 2024

Colfax and Liberty Cap are still icecap peaks, and will likely change elevation in future years. I would like to re-measure these peaks every year to track this melting. However, neither of these peaks is close enough to the cutoff for elevation or prominence to be in jeopardy of leaving the list. Thus, the set of 100 peaks on the Lidar/dGPS WA Top 100 list is now stable.

Acknowledgements

I’d like to thank Steph S for loaning me her 1x sight level to survey Sherpa Peak in 2017 for my first WA Top 100 survey. Katie Stanchak advised on methodology and equipment for the duration of the project. Nick R, Steven S, Talon J, Ross Wallette, Josh Spitzberg, Salius Braciulis, Branden J, Daphne D, and Kahler K helped haul survey equipment up peaks and assisted with field measurements. Greg S gave valuable information about peaks through peakbagger.com and other correspondance, helped me understand the photo analysis tool developed by Edward Earl, and advised me on sight levels. Andy M helped estimate East Fury’s height based on other photo analysis.  Jake O gave valuable advice on the accuracy of Lidar. Compass Data engineers first taught me how to use a differential GPS unit. Dan helped double check my results post processing data from the differential GPS unit, which was loaned to me by Seattle University. Many members of the nwhikers forum gave valuable feedback about my methods and which peaks I should survey. Lily helped me take calibration measurements with the theodolite when I was learning to use it. Many professional surveyors from LSAW gave advice and helped process measurements.

© 2024, egilbert@alum.mit.edu. All rights reserved.

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.